Bullies in the blogosphere...is a code of conduct the answer?
At some point in your life, you've inevitably experienced some sort of bullying whether it was the annoying kid on the playground or maybe even that jerk co-worker who has to be in on everything.
So what about the blogger who disagrees with you, so much so that they would make threats against your personal safety?
That's exactly what happened to a blogger named Kathy Sierra. While details of her situation remain unclear, many people, including notable blogger Tim O'Reilly, are advocating for a defined code of conduct among bloggers. But how would this be achieved?
One of the most important aspects of blogging is virtual anonymity. Posting your own thoughts for anyone and everyone to see behind the veil of a screen name gives you the freedom to do as you please while maintaining little or no concern for your personal actions. Put simply, on the Internet you can be whoever you want, think whatever you want, and ultimately say whatever you want.
So what about regulation? Forget about legal or federal regulation --that's almost laughable-- but I do believe community action needs to be taken when "blog-bullying" occurs. The question is "On who's shoulders does that rest?" A supreme body of bloggers who establishes how you can or can't speak your mind? We have enough political blogs without worrying about bloggers playing politics to decide on a code of conduct.
From my experience, the blogosphere tends to have a flux effect, it's constantly in a state of heating up and cooling off. Self-regulation of bloggers lends itself to a kind of subjective morality which could or couldn't change the way things are right now. In parting, I agree with O'Reilly that we can not make a mass assumption of the blogosphere based on the thoughtless comments of a select few.

